Is there a way to recognize the common and main principles of religions?

Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3hRi89YhwZab1XoxgaK4kCw4VjGF8qfL

Sometimes we encounter people who give importance to God's possible message and are eager to benefit from such teachings, but by observing superstitions that have entered various religions, they conclude that even if God has sent a message, currently there is no reliable way to reach its exact content.

They believe that in these circumstances, adherence to conventional human knowledge and morality is better than succumbing to the damages of following a specific religion or the commonalities of religions. They, in response to this point that such problems exist in other fields too, refer to the uncriticizability of religion and mention the possibility of its gradual improvement as the reason for science's superiority over religion.

But it should be noted that if God has sent a message and for any reason its definitive content is not available to us, everything that is presented as religion and God's word are error-prone interpretations that, like other sciences and human achievements, have been obtained by ordinary people and can be criticized, corrected and revised through scientific methods.

In a precise religious view, sacredness and uncriticizability are specific to God and those who receive and express His word in error-free communication, and this amount is sufficient for our reason to judge that the possibility of reaching a small part of such word should be taken seriously and for recognizing it we should use conventional scientific methods.